How to Parliament?

The troubles on the railways are a mild discouragement to the regular traveller who, like me, knows that a few bad journies will be evened out – eventually - by many that are relaxing and comfortable. Although our rail travel is nothing like the fast reliable and comfortable trains on the Continent.

Commuting from the North-East to Parliament by car is much less fun what with BEAR’s miserable care of the main roads and the congestion around Aberdeen.

But for shorter journies there is an eco-friendly, cheap and healthy alternative. The Parliament will actually pay members for going about their business by bike. Not a lot mind you. But if you paid £5 for your bike at a local roup as I did that’s fine.

My cheap two wheels didn’t come with lights so I’m a strictly daytime rider and my flourescent jacket makes me visible. So it’s good to see our local police encouraging safe winter use of bikes. And getting a good reception for doing so.

Inverness

A visit to Inverness on Parliamentary business was much more welcome than the usual trek to Edinburgh. And not just because it’s closer.

If the Scottish Parliament is to mean anything, it has to be a Parliament for all of Scotland. So a visit of our Justice Committee to take evidence in the north was very welcome indeed.

With the subject being the Land Reform Bill it was particularly appropriate to be in a rural area.

The Bill is likely to receive widespread support for its principles. But attempts to exclude guides and others who are paid to help people access our country from the Bill’s new access rights is proving pretty contentious.

If the evidence given in Inverness is anything to go by, we’ll get that changed.

Rural Affairs

One of the delights and one of the dangers in the Scots Parliament is that every word one utters is recorded and published for all the world to read. Thankfully the writers of the Official Record seem to understand grammar and puncuation better than most MSPs and hence it’s more readable than the speakers notes would have been.

So I receive letters about my comments in Parliament.

A recent one was on the Rural Stewardship Scheme. Frankly I can only describe the introduction of this worthy attempt to reward farmers for looking after nature in ways other than simply planting crops as appaling.

When I spoke about it was in Committee. We were discussing its introduction. And being invited to approve the new scheme – four days after it came into operation.

Could we vote against it and deny hundreds of small farmers their grants in a year when food and mouth has devastated rural businesses throughout Scotland? Of course not.

And it’s not as if the scheme is structured to spread the benefit evenly. Unlike its predecessor, there’s no upper limit on an individual grant and it could be that a few estates may get most of the limited pot of money.

How would that help people in rural Scotland? Not much!

Another case for the New Labour-Liberal Democrat government to get its act together.

Winter’s Woes

As I write, I alternate between sniffles, sneezes and a cough. My local pharmacist’s profits must be soaring as I had to queue for advice. But as this very personal indication of winter will pass – my father used to say, “If you treat a cold it lasts a week and if you don’t it will be seven days” – the news just reaching my desk is a much longer term concern.

After two years of deliberation, New Labour’s First Minister has decided not to publish the document which would have told of the future for Peterhead Prison. Or at least not to publish it yet. A delay of a ‘few months’ is envisaged while a further review is undertaken.

But it may not all be bad news. The word is that the criteria are three – public safety, deterrence and the rehabilitation of offenders. No longer at the top of the list is money. It’s long been thought that the Head of the Scottish Prison Service had an anti-Peterhead Prison agenda and that cost would be his excuse.

The staff at the prison reduced costs and took away that excuse. And their achievements in one of the new key areas – rehabilitation of offenders – must now give us hope.

But as the argument has been won, there is no excuse for further delay.